Cooperation, Diversity and Structured Peer-Reviews

Charles J. Reuter ()
Additional contact information
Charles J. Reuter: CEROS - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Organisations et la Stratégie - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This accounts for a field experiment in the context of a MSc program aimed at fostering cooperation and group learning. Building on an opportunity brought about by a strongly increasing heterogeneity of the student intake, we developed a peer-review system over two years. The main aim of this peer-review system was to bolster the development of strategies for cooperation inside and outside of the classroom over the academic year. Overall the experiment showed that - on average - peer-reviewing was strongly contributing to the development of cooperation strategies. Secondary insights derived from the experiments included the ideas that a smart grouping is important for the ability to develop efficient cooperation strategies, that peer-reviewing generates winners and losers in the sense that a few groups may fail to reach a functional state, that individuals tend to specialize in their role within the group, and this specialization correlates with self-perception and perception by others.

Date: 2022-01-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03549976

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().