Lie-detection algorithms attract few users but vastly increase accusation rates

Alicia von Schenk, Victor Klockmann, Jean-François Bonnefon, Iyad Rahwan and Nils Köbis
Additional contact information
Alicia von Schenk: JMU - Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg = University of Würzburg [Würsburg, Germany], Max Planck Institute for Human Development - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Victor Klockmann: Max Planck Institute for Human Development - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, JMU - Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg = University of Würzburg [Würsburg, Germany]
Iyad Rahwan: Max Planck Institute for Human Development - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Nils Köbis: Max Planck Institute for Human Development - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: People are not very good at detecting lies, which may explain why they refrain from accusing others of lying, given the social costs attached to false accusations — both for the accuser and the accused. Here we consider how this social balance might be disrupted by the availability of lie-detection algorithms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Will people elect to use lie-detection AI that outperforms humans, and if so, will they show less restraint in their accusations? To find out, we built a machine learning classifier whose accuracy (66.86%) was significantly better than human accuracy (46.47%) lie-detection task. We conducted an incentivized lie-detection experiment (N = 2040) in which we measured participants' propensity to use the algorithm, as well as the impact of that use on accusation rates and accuracy. Our results reveal that (a) requesting predictions from the lie-detection AI and especially (b) receiving AI predictions that accuse others of lying increase accusation rates. Due to the low uptake of the algorithm (31.76% requests), we do not see an improvement in accuracy when the AI prediction becomes available for purchase.

Date: 2023-08-30
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04191443v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04191443v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Lie-detection algorithms attract few users but vastly increase accusation rates (2023)
Working Paper: Lie-detection algorithms attract few users but vastly increase accusation rates (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04191443

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().