Moving to higher tiers for soil carbon

Valentin Bellassen (), Emil Cienciala and Aleksi Lehtonen
Additional contact information
Valentin Bellassen: CESAER - Centre d'économie et de sociologie rurales appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Dijon - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Emil Cienciala: CAS - Global Change Research Institute
Aleksi Lehtonen: LUKE - Natural Resources Institute Finland

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The 2023 revised LULUCF regulation will require Tier 2 methods for monitoring all land and carbon pools by the reporting of the 2026 emission year, and then later Tier 3 methods for a subset of land including, among others, forests and peatlands that undergo restoration or protection for nature directives. This requirement is particularly challenging for soil carbon for which Tier 1 is still used by many Member States for several land categories. This document offers answers to frequently arising questions in the topic of higher methodological tiers for soil carbon pool monitoring, as well as practical advice on how to implement them. Regarding Tier 2, we suggest a step by step method to estimate reference carbon stock (SOCref) and carbon stock modifying factors (eg. FLU) using national datasets on soil carbon or international databases such as the LUCAS soil survey. We also propose a list of FMG emission factors for agricultural practices based on a literature review for the temperate zone. Regarding Tier 3, we distinguish between measurement-based methods (repeated soil inventories) and model-based methods. Measurement-based methods tend to be costly, but they are necessary as no model can guarantee an accurate national total in a context of environmental and management changes. Model-based methods allow to disentangle the different drivers of soil carbon changes and reduce the number of repeated measurements needed. Their evaluation, in line with the IPCC guidelines, is also discussed.

Keywords: soil carbon; LULUCF regulation; monitoring; model; data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04230776v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. 2023

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04230776v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04230776

DOI: 10.2760/056380

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().