Does Corporate Governance Help to Reduce Carbon Emissions? Some Empirical Evidence

Cécile Cézanne (), Gaye del Lo, Yves Kassi and Sandra Rigot
Additional contact information
Cécile Cézanne: GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, Chaire Energie & Prospérité - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - Institut Louis Bachelier
Gaye del Lo: CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord
Yves Kassi: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord
Sandra Rigot: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Chaire Energie & Prospérité - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - Institut Louis Bachelier

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Climate change is the biggest challenge that humanity is currently facing. Companies have become increasingly aware of the need to address this issue. They are affected by climate risks, just as their activities can contribute to climate change. In this paper, we analyze the role of firms in mitigating climate change through their model of corporate governance. We examine the impact of key organizational control and incentive arrangements (board size, board independence, board gender diversity, sustainability committee, and sustainability-based executive compensation) on firms' carbon emission intensities. Using a fixed effects model on a panel of 305 firms over the period 2015-2021, we show the importance of corporate governance for reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions and reveal its limitations in efforts to reduce Scope 3 emissions. Board gender diversity, the presence of a sustainability committee, and the existence of sustainability compensation incentives help to reduce corporate carbon emissions. Our results also show that the effects are sensitive to the stock market index and to the type of industry. Based on these results, several managerial and political implications can be drawn to improve corporate carbon performance.

Keywords: corporate governance board independence gender diversity sustainability committee sustainability-linked executive compensation GHG emissions Scope 1 Scope 2 Scope 3. JEL: G34; G38; M12; M14; O16; Q54; corporate governance; board independence; gender diversity; sustainability committee; sustainability-linked executive compensation; GHG emissions; Scope 1; Scope 2; Scope 3. JEL: G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-12-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04353535

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4621463

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().