Demand response when dynamic and flat power retail tariffs coexist
Julien Ancel ()
Additional contact information
Julien Ancel: LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay, CEC - Chaire Economie du Climat - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
Demand-side response, essential for developing low-carbon power systems, is often triggered through dynamic price signals. Consumers being exposed to such price signals depend on whether their power supply contract is based on a flat or a dynamic tariff, mimicking at least partially the dynamics of this price. In liberalized power retail markets, these two types of contracts can enter into competition for the same population. This article focuses on such interaction. Specifically, we study the retail market equilibrium when flat and dynamic tariffs compete for the same population, which is horizontally differentiated by its ability to engage in demand response. We obtain analytical results defining implicitly retailers' best responses, equilibria of the retail market and, as a reference point, optimal offers for a regulated unique retailer, both for variable and truly dynamic tariffs. In the general case, the price competition between the two retailers imposes that the dynamic contract can only convey the dynamics of the underlying supply costs with a diminishing scaling factor dependent on the distribution of the propensity to flexibility among the population. An application to the French case based on 2023-2024 data is provided, with a focus on flexible consumers' enrollment into dynamic tariffs and retailers' markups. For variable tariffs (varying in time but fixed ex-ante), competition between tariffs yields lower levels of flexibility effectively triggered through tariffs, even at high flexibility potential of the population. For truly dynamic tariffs (varying in time and unknown ex-ante), the unique retailer option seems less attractive for a regulator interested in mobilizing demand-side flexibility than the retail competition between specialized retailers. This is notably the case if consumers overestimate electricity prices on average. However, with dynamic tariffs, less flexible consumers bear the cost of imperfectly forecasting the dynamic tariff levels, even though this imperfect forecast is a trait of the whole population.
Keywords: Power retail; Price competition; Dynamic tariffs; Demand response (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-12-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04830372
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().