EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring regret theory in the health and financial domain

Henrik Andersson, Henrik Scholtz and Jiakun Zheng
Additional contact information
Henrik Andersson: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Henrik Scholtz: UZH - Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich
Jiakun Zheng: School of Finance at Renmin University of China

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper applies an experimental design developed by Bleichrodt et al. (2010) to test the key assumption of original regret theory (Loomes and Sugden, 1982): convexity of the regret function. We elicit preferences for financial and health outcomes for about 1,000 subjects, yielding some evidence of minor dierences between financial domain and health domain. While aggregate results seem to support regret theory at first sight, individual-level analyses show that the majority of subjects violate the predictions of regret theory with a convex regret function. Our results thus challenge the predictive accuracy of regret theory as a descriptive theory of decision-making under risk.

Keywords: Original regret theory; Decision under uncertainty; Utility measurement; Online experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02-24
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04963272v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04963272v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04963272

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04963272