Ensuring the Sustainability of the U.S. Pay-As-You-Go System *
Xavier Fairise,
Jhon Jair Gonzalez-Pulgarin,
François Langot () and
Alexandre Popier
Additional contact information
Xavier Fairise: GAINS - Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et des Niveaux Salariaux - UM - Le Mans Université
Jhon Jair Gonzalez-Pulgarin: CEPREMAP - Centre pour la recherche économique et ses applications - ECO ENS-PSL - Département d'économie de l'ENS-PSL - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres
François Langot: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, GAINS - Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et des Niveaux Salariaux - UM - Le Mans Université, CEPREMAP - Centre pour la recherche économique et ses applications - ECO ENS-PSL - Département d'économie de l'ENS-PSL - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres
Alexandre Popier: LMM - Laboratoire Manceau de Mathématiques - UM - Le Mans Université
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
We propose a heterogeneous agent model to explore the sustainability of the Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) pension system in the context of an aging population and an evolving educational system. We also evaluate its implications for wealth distribution. We analyze optimal reform strategies including potential adjustments to income tax rates, pension levels, and retirement age. Our results indicate that a 5-year increase in lifespan requires either a 7 percentage point increase in tax rates or an 18 percentage point reduction in the pension replacement ratio. Without an increase in educational attainment, U.S. GDP would stagnate at 2020 levels. Adjusting the system through pension reductions requires greater savings and leads to lower labor supply distortions. Furthermore, adjusting the PAYG system through changes in the retirement age yields the highest GDP increase among the measures considered. In terms of wealth inequalities, these increase with tax hikes and pension reductions, with the most significant rise occurring when adjusting through a higher retirement age. Regarding welfare, the positive impact of increased education is outweighed by the negative effects of lifespan extension. Finally, postponing the retirement age leads to the smallest reduction in retirees' welfare but also reduces the insurance needs of young people.
Keywords: wealth inequality; pensions; income tax; aging; education; heterogeneous agents (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-04-03
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05019679v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05019679v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05019679
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().