GPT Adoption Dilemma and the Impact of Disclosure Policies

Cathy Yang, David Restrepo-Amariles, Leo Allen and Aurore Troussel
Additional contact information
Cathy Yang: HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales
David Restrepo-Amariles: HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales
Leo Allen: HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales
Aurore Troussel: HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, have proven effective in content generation and productivity enhancement. However, legal risks associated with these tools lead to adoption variance and concealment of AI use within organizations. This study examines the impact of disclosure on ChatGPT adoption in legal, audit and advisory roles in consulting firms through the lens of agency theory. We conducted a survey experiment to evaluate agency costs in the context of unregulated corporate use of ChatGPT, with a particular focus on how mandatory disclosure influences information asymmetry and misaligned interests. Our findings indicate that in the absence of corporate regulations, such as an AI policy, firms may incur agency costs, which can hinder the full benefits of GPT adoption. While disclosure policies reduce information asymmetry, they do not significantly lower overall agency costs due to managers undervaluing analysts' contributions with GPT use. Finally, we examine the scope of existing regulations in Europe and the United States regarding disclosure requirements, explore the sharing of risk and responsibility within firms, and analyze how incentive mechanisms promote responsible AI adoption.

Keywords: Human-GPT collaboration; GPT disclosure; agency theory; content evaluation; survey experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-05-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05187226

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5201666

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().