More forest more problems? Understanding family forest owners’ concerns in the United States
David Shanafelt (),
Brian Danley,
Jesse Caputo and
Marielle Brunette ()
Additional contact information
David Shanafelt: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Brian Danley: Uppsala Universitet [Uppsala]
Jesse Caputo: USDA - United States Department of Agriculture
Marielle Brunette: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
Forests face an increasing number of threats of both natural and human cause, many of which are expected to increase in frequency and intensity in the future. Recent calls in the literature have pointed out the need for holistic approaches when developing ecosystem and forest management policies, which requires a broad understanding of how forest owners perceive the uncertainties and risks that may threaten their forests. In this paper, we study a set of sixteen concerns in the United States National Woodland Owners Survey (NWOS). Our set of concerns span a broad array of types and causesnatural and anthropogenicthat capture multiple aspects of forest ownership. We measure the level of concern that family forest owners associate with each concern variable, and explore how the levels of concern vary with each other. We then turn our attention to the "total concernedness" of forest owners by summing the level of concern across all concern variables to study how individuals distribute their concerns across multiple ownership challenges. Finally, we relate an individual's total concern to his/her socio-demographic and forest-ownership attributes to understand how variation in these factors may be associated with an owner's level of overall concernedness. We find that private forest owners report moderate levels of concern, on average, for all concerns in the NWOS, and that concerns are, in general, positively correlated with each other. Moreover, forest owners tend to distribute their concerns evenly across all types of concerns, as opposed to high levels of one concern and none for the others. Among our results, we discuss implications of the finding that the majority of forest owners in our survey express moderate levels of concern for most ownership challenges. Our analysis highlights a general need for forest policy and regulations that properly consider the full suite of owner preferences, benefits, and costs, including concerns.
Keywords: Concerns; National Woodland Owners Survey (NWOS); Family forest owners; Threats; Tobit regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-09-08
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05244346v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05244346v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05244346
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().