Measuring Climate Performance Against National Commitments: A Gap-to-Target Indicator for the Kyoto Protocol, First and Second NDCs

Pengd Wende Richard Nikiema
Additional contact information
Pengd Wende Richard Nikiema: LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [2022-...] - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper introduces a new indicator to assess countries' climate performance by comparing their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions with the levels implied by their commitments under the Kyoto Protocol and the first and second Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Existing climate indices track emissions or policy ambition but do not provide a harmonised, cross-country measure of the distance to pledged mitigation targets. Building on the literature on distance-to-target metrics, we develop a simple Gap-to-Target indicator applicable across successive commitment cycles.Using data for 135 countries over 1990-2024, we compute annual measures of alignment with national pledges and document systematic patterns across income groups, regions, and commitment periods. Descriptive trends reveal a widening disconnect between rising ambition and realised emissions, especially under the second NDC cycle. Dynamic system-GMM estimations show that economic development, renewable energy deployment, environmental expenditure, fiscal capacity, and climate vulnerability are key determinants of countries' ability to meet their commitments.The Gap-to-Target indicator offers policymakers and international financial institutions a transparent tool to track performance, identify structural implementation gaps, and better target climate finance, and it can be extended to other environmental commitments such as biodiversity or land degradation neutrality.The indicator can also be extended to the upcoming 2025 NDCs and future commitment cycles, enhancing its relevance for long-term climate governance. With appropriate sub-national data, it could further be adapted to regional and local authorities, supporting the decentralisation of climate action monitoring.

Date: 2025-11-22
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05378168v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05378168v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05378168

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17683199

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().