Are Punctual and Regular Train Lines Efficient? Re-evaluating Regional Railway Performance with a Service Quality-Integrated DEA Framework

Nicolas Fabre, Florent Laroche (), Laura Eboli, Gabriella Mazzulla and Louafi Bouzouina ()
Additional contact information
Nicolas Fabre: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CRC Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes - Chambre régionale des comptes Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Florent Laroche: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Laura Eboli: UniCal - Università della Calabria [Arcavacata di Rende, Italia] = University of Calabria [Italy] = Université de Calabre [Italie]
Gabriella Mazzulla: UniCal - Università della Calabria [Arcavacata di Rende, Italia] = University of Calabria [Italy] = Université de Calabre [Italie]
Louafi Bouzouina: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Are the most cost-efficient train lines providing the best service? This study demonstrates that efficiency models often misidentify operational success, rewarding lines with significant service quality deficits. Based on a granular analysis of 174 line-year observations across 58 French regional railway lines, we propose and apply a new efficiency framework. By incorporating essential Quality of Service indicators (punctuality, regularity, frequency and crowding) into the evaluation, we reveal a fundamental reshuffling of performance rankings. Our findings show a clear divergence: cost-efficient lines with poor service are penalized, while lines delivering high-quality service see their performance scores improve significantly. The analysis further identifies the distinct characteristics of lines that experience the greatest changes in rank. As France moves towards competitive tendering in the rail sector, these results carry significant policy implications. A sole focus on cost-efficiency risks incentivizing service degradation. This research offers Public Transport Authorities a robust, quality-aware tool to facilitate more accurate performance diagnostics, identify benchmark lines, and ultimately foster a system that prioritizes both economic viability and passenger welfare.

Keywords: Quality of Service; Regional Railway; Competition; Working Papers du LAET; DEA; Efficiency analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-11
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05383564v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05383564v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05383564

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().