Family Ownership, ESG Strategies, and Corporate Risk-Taking: Econometric and Machine Learning Evidence

Angelo Leogrande (), Marco Savorgnan (), Alberto Costantiello, Carlo Drago () and Massimo Arnone ()
Additional contact information
Angelo Leogrande: LUM - Università LUM Giuseppe Degennaro = University Giuseppe Degennaro
Alberto Costantiello: LUM - Università LUM Giuseppe Degennaro = University Giuseppe Degennaro
Carlo Drago: UNICUSANO - University Niccolò Cusano = Università Niccoló Cusano
Massimo Arnone: Unict - Università degli studi di Catania = University of Catania

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The present study aims to contribute to the exploration of the combined effect of sustainability strategies and family governance on corporate risk-taking, with a focus on the temporal dimension of ESG engagement and the multidimensional nature of family involvement. Although a number of research papers have attempted to investigate the interrelations between ESG performance, corporate risk, and ownership structure, the existing research is fragmented, static, and limited in terms of its research methodology. Therefore, this article aims to provide a framework that (a) distinguishes between longterm and short-term ESG performance and (b) distinguishes between ownership incentives and management control in family firms. The present study uses a sample of listed corporations and combines three different research methods: fixed effects panel regressions, cluster analysis, and machine learning regression methods. The results of this study suggest that long-term ESG performance is negatively related to corporate risk, as proxied by the volatility of operating performance. The effect of short-term ESG performance on corporate risk is less robust and less consistent. Furthermore, this study finds that family cash-flow rights and family CEOs are negatively related to corporate risk, in accordance with the SEW hypothesis. Finally, this study reveals that the positive interaction effect of long-term ESG performance and family cash-flow rights mitigates the negative effect of sustainability on corporate risk in family-controlled corporations. The results of this study show that cluster analysis reveals a high degree of heterogeneity in corporate strategic profiles, with different clusters characterized by specific configurations of ESG orientation, family involvement, corporate governance structure, firm size, and corporate risk. The results of this study also show that the proposed model has a high predictive power in relation to corporate risk levels, as indicated by the results of the random forest regression analysis. Finally, this study reveals that financial fundamentals are more important in determining corporate risk than ESG engagement and family control; however, ESG engagement and family control are secondary but significant and nonlinear determinants of corporate risk.

Keywords: C23; G34; L25; M14; Sustainability JEL codes: G32; Corporate governance; Corporate risk; ESG; Family firms; Family firms ESG Corporate risk Corporate governance Sustainability JEL codes: G32 M14 L25 G34 C23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-02-26
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05528311v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05528311v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05528311

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().