EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Consumer Choice between Recommendation Algorithms - Experimental Evidence

Felix Schleef ()
Additional contact information
Felix Schleef: HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, CREST - Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique - ENSAI - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information [Bruz] - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Regulators are increasingly concerned with the power of large online platforms to bias consumer recommendations. In light of these concerns, I study experimentally whether giving consumers the choice between several recommendation algorithms can improve consumer welfare. I develop a novel experimental setting in which I first elicit the subjects' preferences and then expose them to choice tasks intermediated by personalized recommendation algorithms. When faced with a costly choice between two algorithms, subjects have a positive willingness-to-pay for better recommendations. However, subjects underestimate the potential gain from the better algorithm: a \$1 increase in estimated gain raises willingness-to-pay by only \$0.15 on average. These findings suggest that giving consumers power over recommendation algorithms to curtail potential abuse is not straightforward. However, it may be a viable business for platforms to offer improved recommendation algorithms to consumers for a fee.

Date: 2026-03-19
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05559513v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05559513v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05559513

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-03-24
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05559513