Optimal resource allocation for invasive species control: Two decision criteria for site prioritization

Pierre Courtois () and Julia de Frutos-Cachorro
Additional contact information
Pierre Courtois: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier
Julia de Frutos-Cachorro: UB - Universitat de Barcelona

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Invasive species management is often guided by the implicit assumption that minimizing the invaded population will concurrently minimize the economic and ecological damages it causes. However, this alignment is challenged when damages are spatially heterogeneous, raising a critical question for environmental managers: should limited control budgets prioritize sites to minimize invasion state or damage? This paper defines and compares two simple cost-effective decision criteria for site prioritization: an invasion-minimization criterion, which targets sites based on their per-unit-cost contribution to future invasion spread, and a damageminimization criterion, which targets sites based on their per-unit-cost contribution to future damages. We solve analytically the two optimization problems and derive the restrictive theoretical conditions under which these criteria yield identical rankings. Applying these criteria to the management of Primrose willow (Genus Ludwigia) in the Brière Regional Park in France, we demonstrate that for a realistic budget, the two criteria lead to starkly different spatial allocations of effort. The damage-minimization criteria concentrates resources in a few high-value, highly invaded areas, while the invasion-minimization criteria spreads effort across many more, less valued areas to curb overall invasion state. Our analysis reveals that the common managerial practice of prioritizing population reduction may not align with damage reduction objectives unless damages are uniform or dispersal networks are trivial. This work provides clear, operational decision rules and highlights the need for explicit consideration of management objectives and spatial heterogeneity in the economics of biological invasions.

Keywords: Primrose willow; Brière marshland.; Invasive Species; Cost-effective management; Benefit-cost ratio criteria; Invasion-cost ratio criteria (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-03-23
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05563169v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05563169v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05563169

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().