Modelling of public transport route choice adaptations to unplanned metro disruptions using smart card data

Lawrence Christopher Duncan (), Benjamin Cottreau and Ouassim Manout ()
Additional contact information
Lawrence Christopher Duncan: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Benjamin Cottreau: KTH STOCKHOLM - Institutionen för Matematik - KTH - KTH - KTH Royal Institute of Technology [Stockholm]
Ouassim Manout: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: It is vital that public transport disruption mitigation strategies are supported by a clear understanding of travel behaviour and preferences, including of disrupted route choices. This paper, for the first time, uses smart card data to analyse multimodal public transport route choices immediately after being disrupted by an unplanned metro service closure. We develop methodologies for identifying commuters and their usual commute route, approximating home/work locations, and identifying disrupted trips and onward post-disruption routes. These methodologies are operationalised in a case study of Lyon, France, where 5031 post-metro-disruption routes are identified, including routes taking bridging buses (bus replacement services). These route observations are used to estimate a multimodal route choice model with a detailed utility function that provides good fit to the data. Route choice preferences and behaviours are analysed and compared with those from usual commute route choices. Some of the key findings are that, post-disruption: there is a stronger dispreference for transferring and a lower dispreference for in-vehicle time, metro is less innately attractive than bus/tram, contrasting with usual commuting preferences, bridging bus is the least innately attractive mode, users have a stronger dispreference for egress time than access time (from the disrupted metro), and there is a positive preference for route robustness. Results are also compared with those from existing studies, impacts of disruptions on travel times are evaluated, and policy implications of the work are discussed.

Keywords: public transport; disruption; route choice; automatic fare collection data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-04-27
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05603661v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05603661v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05603661

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().