ESG Preferences, Returns, and Risk: A Utility-Based Theory of ESG Investment

Henri Tran () and Thu Ha Tran
Additional contact information
Henri Tran: BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - ESC Dijon-Bourgogne, CEREN - Centre de Recherche sur les Entreprises - BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - ESC Dijon-Bourgogne
Thu Ha Tran: BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - ESC Dijon-Bourgogne, CEREN - Centre de Recherche sur les Entreprises - BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - ESC Dijon-Bourgogne

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We develop a portfolio-choice framework that determines an investor's optimal level and direction of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) exposure. Rather than treating ESG investment as a binary choice or imposing fixed screening and exclusion rules, we model ESG exposure as a continuous reallocation from an investor's baseline portfolio. Optimal ESG exposure is jointly determined by three economically distinct forces: ESG-related expected-return beliefs, intrinsic ESG preferences, and the interaction of the ESG tilt with existing portfolio risk. The model yields a closed-form solution that identifies both whether an investor should increase or decrease ESG exposure and by how much. A key theoretical result is that ESG demand can arise from conventional portfolio optimization alone: even without favorable ESG return beliefs or intrinsic ESG preferences, an investor optimally increases ESG exposure when the ESG tilt hedges existing portfolio risk and decreases it when the tilt amplifies risk. Consequently, optimal ESG exposure is inherently investor- and portfolio-dependent, and observed ESG holdings need not identify the motives underlying ESG investment. We implement the framework using S&P 500 securities and five additional major equity universes. In the S&P 500, a positive ESG tilt amplifies baseline portfolio risk, producing a long-only pure-hedging allocation that reallocates 10.48% of portfolio weight from above- toward below-benchmark-ESG securities. In contrast, the FTSE 100 and CAC 40 exhibit a hedging effect, generating positive ESG exposure from portfolio-risk considerations alone. For practitioners, the methodology provides a transparent and implementable rule for integrating ESG characteristics directly into portfolio construction. Portfolio managers can construct a baseline allocation using their conventional investment process and then use the framework to tailor the portfolio's ESG exposure to investors' return beliefs, ESG preferences, and risk tolerance, while translating the resulting optimal exposure into security-level portfolio weights.

Keywords: Portfolio choice; Investor preferences; Asset pricing; Risk and diversification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-02-17
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05670614

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.6181378

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().