INDIVIDUAL DELIBERATION, MORAL AUTONOMY AND EMOTIONS: ROUSSEAU ON CITIZENSHIP

Christophe Salvat

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The present study addresses the question of uncertainty in individual deliberation in Rousseau's philosophy. Accordingly, it intends to consider in a new light his account of virtue and citizenship which cannot possibly be defined as systematic obedience to the general will. Weakness of the will, indeterminacy and prudence have not yet been adequately emphasized, despite some convincing evidence. Chapter XI, book III, of the Social Contract on the death of the body politic, for example, prompts us to reconsider the individuals' allegiance to the general will. However, it would be equally extreme to dismiss the core of his thought which affirms the legitimate superiority of the general will over particular desires. Rather it will beillustrated here that, when brought together, these two propositions provide a fruitful way of approaching this ethical issue.

Keywords: Rousseau; Freedom; Ethics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-07-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00353301
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00353301/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Individual deliberation, moral autonomy and emotions: Rousseau on citizenship (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00353301

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().