Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation

Nicolas Jacquemet (), Alexander James (), Stephane Luchini () and Jason Shogren
Additional contact information
Nicolas Jacquemet: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Alexander James: UW - University of Wyoming
Stephane Luchini: GREQAM - Groupement de Recherche en Économie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Environmental economics is now a long standing field of research; much has been learned on how environmental policy can use incentives to drive individual behaviors. Among the many examples, preference elicitation is the most discussed case in which incentives fail to accurately implement efficient behavior. Using this as our motivating example, herein we explore the cross-fertilization between environmental economics and social psychology. We first review how the lessons drawn from social psychology helped address the hypothetical bias issue. We then turn to the future of this process by focusing on how cheap talk scripts influence preference elicitation. Our experimental results shows CT scripts work through persuasion – i.e. changes mind, but poorly changes actions. in that sense, preference elicitation still lacks a way of making communication binding – i.e. a way to alter intrinsic motivation of subjects to behave truthfully.

Keywords: Social psychology; commitment; persuasive communication; preference elicitation; Psychologie sociale; engagement; communication persuasive; révélation des préférences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-03-08
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00462193v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00462193v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation (2011)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2011)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2011)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2011)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2010)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2010)
Working Paper: Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00462193

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().