Should we stay or should we go? Irregular migration and duration of stay: the case of Moldovan migrants
Daniela Borodak and
Ariane Tichit ()
Additional contact information
Daniela Borodak: CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - UdA - Université d'Auvergne - Clermont-Ferrand I - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Working Papers from HAL
This paper analyses the link between irregular migration and duration of stay. Using household and regional development data from Moldova and running a duration model, we find that duration of migration is longer for illegal migrants than legal migrants. Further investigation demonstrates that this effect is driven by significantly higher migration costs. From a policy perspective, our findings on irregular migration are highly relevant since they question the outcome of restrictive migration policies. This paper, like an increasing number of migration literature papers converging on the same conclusions, contributes further arguments for redefining migration policy.
Keywords: International migration; Duration model; Irregular migration; Moldova (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00554296v2
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Should we stay or should we go? Irregular migration and duration of stay: The case of Moldovan migrants (2013)
Working Paper: Should we stay or should we go? Irregular migration and duration of stay: the case of Moldovan migrants (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00554296
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().