Exploring the Nature of Strategic Interactions in the Ratification Process of the Kyoto Protocol
Working Papers from HAL
Do countries interact when they decide whether or not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol? If so, what is the nature of these interactions? To answer these questions, we provide a theoretical analysis based on the notions of strategic substitutability and strategic complementarity. Firstly, we analyze the nature of interactions between countries when they are merely seeking to provide a global public good. Secondly, we argue that countries have ties in several spheres in the real world and we try to shed light on the nature of the strategic interactions generated by geographic proximity, trade flows, and green investment flows. The empirical investigation is realized via the estimation of a parametric survival model, and our data sample covers 164 countries for the period from 1998 to 2009. We find evidence that, while countries' ratification decisions are originally strategic substitutes, they became strategic complements when we focus on the ratification decisions of specific peers.
Keywords: Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; International Environmental Agreements; Spatial survival model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00607785v3
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Exploring the Nature of Strategic Interactions in the Ratification Process of the Kyoto Protocol (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00607785
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Series data maintained by CCSD ().