Absolute Qualified Majoritarianism: How Does the Threshold Matter?

Ali Ozkes and Remzi Sanver

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We study absolute qualified majority rules in a setting with more than two alternatives. We show that given two qualified majority rules, if transitivity is desired for the societal outcome and if the thresholds of one of these rules are at least as high as the other's for any pair of alternatives, then at each preference profile the rule with higher thresholds results in a coarser social ranking. Hence all absolute qualified majority rules can be expressed as specific coarsenings of the simple majority rule.

Keywords: qualified majority rules; simple majority rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01416727v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01416727v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Absolute qualified majoritarianism: How does the threshold matter? (2017)
Working Paper: Absolute qualified majoritarianism: how does the threshold matter? (2017)
Working Paper: Absolute Qualified Majoritarianism: How Does the Threshold Matter? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01416727

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().