Scrambled Questions Penalty in Multiple Choice Tests: New Evidence from French Undergraduate Students
Morgan Raux (),
Marc Sangnier () and
Tanguy van Ypersele ()
Working Papers from HAL
This note evaluates the scrambled questions penalty using multiple choice tests taken by first-year undergraduate students who follow a microeconomics introductory course. We provide new evidence that students perform worse at scrambled questionnaires than at logically ordered ones. We improve on previous studies by explicitly modeling students individual skills thanks to a fixed effects regression. We further show that the scrambled questions penalty does not differ along gender but varies along the distribution of students' skills and mostly affects students with lower-intermediate skills.
Keywords: student performance; scrambled questions; multiple choice tests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01417964
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Scrambled questions penalty in multiple choice tests: New evidence from French undergraduate students (2017)
Working Paper: Scrambled questions penalty in multiple choice tests: New evidence from French undergraduate students (2017)
Working Paper: Scrambled Questions Penalty in Multiple Choice Tests: New Evidence from French Undergraduate Students (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01417964
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().