Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections?

Konrad Dierks, Ingela Alger and Jean-François Laslier
Additional contact information
Konrad Dierks: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: What drives voters' decisions to participate in large elections under costly voting, despite the rational expectation that this has no impact on the outcome? We propose a new model of ethical voters, by positing that they have Kantian or semi-Kantian preferences. With such preferences, voters evaluate their behavior in light of what the outcome would be, should a fraction of the other voters choose the same course of action. The "other voters" can be either the entire population ("non-partisan ethics") or the individuals with same interest ("partisan ethics"). In a model with two candidates and a continuum of voters, we find that turnout is strictly positive as soon as the evaluation by the voters of the political outcome is not strictly of the "winner-take-all" kind. Moreover, the equilibrium turnout rates depend on the specifics of the election at hand, such as the relative stake of the election for the two supporter groups and the presence of core constituent groups.

Keywords: Voter turnout; Ethical voter; Kantian morality; Universalization; Homo moralis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-06
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03152172v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03152172v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? (2024)
Working Paper: Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? (2024)
Working Paper: Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? (2024)
Working Paper: Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03152172

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().