EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Approval voting versus proportional threshold methods: so far and yet so near

Susumu Cato (), Stéphane Gonzalez (), Eric Rémila () and Philippe Solal
Additional contact information
Susumu Cato: UTokyo - Tōkyō teikoku daigaku = University of Tokyo [Tokyo]
Eric Rémila: GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper provides the first axiomatic characterization of a class of certification methods, dubbed proportional threshold methods, that builds on consistency properties across populations and profiles of binary opinions. We then compare proportional threshold methods with the approval voting method. We formally outline the similarities and differences of these two collective decision processes and provide an axiomatic characterization of the approval voting method that, perhaps surprisingly, is closely related to the one of the proportional threshold methods.

Keywords: approval voting method; certification method; consistency; evaluation; monotonicity; proportional threshold method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03858356v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03858356v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03858356

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03858356