The causal impact of children? Rethinking the identification and estimation of child penalties

Katharina Kaeppel
Additional contact information
Katharina Kaeppel: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: A fast-growing literature estimates child penalties -the impact of parenthood on the labor market outcomes of mothers relative to fathers -using event study design. This paper clarifies the identification assumption underlying the most commonly used specification with event time, year, and age fixed effects, and shows that this approach is prone to bias in the presence of heterogeneity by age and calendar year, even under valid identification. I then propose an unbiased estimator, using the same identification framework. Applied to French administrative data, my estimates for mothers are 27% smaller than those using the standard approach. The paper also discusses identification under an alternative parallel trend assumption, that is, when controlling for individual unobserved heterogeneity, and highlights key trade-offs in defining counterfactuals, as one cannot simultaneously absorb individual heterogeneity, age, age at birth, and event time. I provide a framework to build an estimator step-by-step, which is easily adaptable depending on which comparisons researchers assess most appropriate. Finally, I document substantial heterogeneity by age at childbirth for both mothers and fathers. By eight years after the birth of their first child, mothers aged 20-25 at birth lose 50% compared to their counterfactual earnings, compared to 12-20% for older mothers. Fathers aged 20-25 at first birth earn on average 26% less eight years later, while effects for older fathers are close to zero. These findings have important implications for both policy and applied research using event study designs to estimate the causal impact of children.

Keywords: child penalty; female labor supply; heterogeneous treatment effects; event studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05419149v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05419149v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-05419149

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().