EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Universes of Arguments: Mapping the Redistributive Debates in Norway and the United States

Morten Støstad (), Max Lobeck () and Chloé de Meulenaer ()
Additional contact information
Morten Støstad: Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration
Max Lobeck: Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Action
Chloé de Meulenaer: LSE - London School of Economics and Political Science

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We use natural language processing to classify all pro-redistributive speeches in the U.S. Congress and Norwegian Storting from 2015 to 2022, contrasting arguments based on fairness with those based on the negative societal consequences of inequality (inequality externalities). Fairness-based arguments are markedly more emotional-especially expressing anger and compassion-while externality-based arguments are more analytical and frequently draw on empirical evidence. Pro-redistributive arguments in the U.S. primarily focus on fairness, whereas externality concerns are a central feature of the Norwegian debate. In an experiment, both types of arguments are similarly convincing to U.S. survey respondents, although a preference for fairness is linked to lower educational attainment. Our results document two distinct ways to argue for redistribution, whose prevalence differs across countries, and provide a general framework for comparing the content and evaluations of arguments across domains.

Date: 2026-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05626361v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05626361v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-05626361

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-02
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-05626361