La neuroéconomie en question: débats et controverses

Daniel Serra

CEE-M Working Papers from CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro

Abstract: As any nascent discipline, neuroeconomics raises many questions. The article reports on the main debates and controversies that neuroeconomics has aroused in the literature. Three major issues relating to the status of knowledge produced are addressed. Are results reliable? Are they scientifically legitimate? What is their usefulness for an economist? This framework allows to assess the main criticisms addressed to neuroeconomics and the nature of the parades which can be deployed.

Keywords: Neuroéconomie; economie comportementale; economie expérimentale; méthodologie économique; epistémologie scientifique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme and nep-hpe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02160911v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02160911v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: La neuroéconomie en question: débats et controverses (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpceem:halshs-02160911

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEE-M Working Papers from CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laurent Garnier ().