U.S. Education and Training Policy: A Re-evaluation of the Underlying Assumptions Behind the "New Consensus A Re-evaluation of the Underlying Assumptions Behind the "New Consensus"
Rebecca L. Roselius and
Jeffrey Smith ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Becky Roselius Haney
No 9304, Working Papers from Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago
In response to rising wage inequality and lower real wages for low-skill workers over the last decade, a "new consensus" has emerged that questions the ability of American schools and firms to educate and train workers, especially non-college bound youth. The remedies proposed by proponents of the new consensus include implementing an apprenticeship system patterned after programs in Germany, creating a nation-wide system of vocational credentialing and increasing the availability of government training programs. In this paper, we critically examine the assumptions underlying the current proposals. We do not find empirical or theoretical justification for many of the proposed programs. While some of these programs aim toward desirable ends, other more efficient, less costly means exist to attain their objectives.
Keywords: job training; vocational education; labor force (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publication ... pers/pdf/wp_93_4.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:har:wpaper:9304
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Eleanor Cartelli (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .