What Makes Lay Intuition So Often Fundamentally at Odds with Expert Assessments of Environmental Risks?

Howard Margolis

No 9601, Working Papers from Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago

Abstract: The prevailing account of expert vs. lay conflicts of risk intuition on such matters as nuclear waste and pesticides is that experts focus on a very narrow range of consequences, but ordinary people have a much richer sense of what is involved in choices about risk. Experts may feel comfortable with a level of precautions that seems wholly inadequate to ordinary people, because they typically assess risks in terms of quantitative assessments, while ordinary citizens care a great deal about qualitative aspects of risk, such as voluntariness, and how far authorities responsible for managing the risk have earned their trust, and about risk to future generations. In a very recent book Dealing with Risk (University of Chicago Press, 1996) I argue that this widely accepted view is in fact wrong.

Keywords: risk; risk assessment; expert opinion; lay opinion; environmental hazard; environmental degradation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publication ... pers/pdf/wp_96_1.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to harrisschool.uchicago.edu:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:har:wpaper:9601

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Eleanor Cartelli ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).