The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution

N. Gregory Mankiw and Matthew Weinzierl ()

No 09-139, Harvard Business School Working Papers from Harvard Business School

Abstract: Should the income tax include a credit for short taxpayers and a surcharge for tall ones? The standard Utilitarian framework for tax analysis answers this question in the affirmative. Moreover, a plausible parameterization using data on height and wages implies a substantial height tax: a tall person earning $50,000 should pay $4,500 more in tax than a short person. One interpretation is that personal attributes correlated with wages should be considered more widely for determining taxes. Alternatively, if policies such as a height tax are rejected, then the standard Utilitarian framework must fail to capture intuitive notions of distributive justice.

Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2009-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pub
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-139.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution (2010)
Working Paper: The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hbs:wpaper:09-139

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Harvard Business School Working Papers from Harvard Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HBS ().