Have Chinaâ€™s Unconverted Research Institutes Been Left Behind
Renai Jiang (),
Daniel Tortorice () and
Zhaohui Xuan ()
Additional contact information
Renai Jiang: School of Economics and Finance, Xian Jiaotong University
Zhaohui Xuan: Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development
No 1909, Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics
Beginning in 1999, the Chinese government initiated a substantial restructuring of its roughly 4,000 research institutes. While many were given specific classifications to designate their institute objectives, many were left unconverted. We use a novel, fifteen-year panel dataset on Chinaâ€™s system of research institutes to examine if unconverted institutes were disadvantaged relative to their converted counterparts. Unconverted institutes had a higher risk of exiting the research institute system and lower productivity growth than converted research institutes. However, their revenue growth kept pace with converted institutes and they continued to patent at similar rates. Finally, their publication of scientific papers declined relative to converted institutes. We conclude that the restructuring program has not left the unconverted institutes behind.
Keywords: China; R&D; Research Policy; Patenting; Research Institutes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O32 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hcx:wpaper:1909
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson ().