The Paradox of the Social Investment State. Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era

Bea Cantillon

No 1103, Working Papers from Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp

Abstract: After the European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion, on the eve of the elaboration of policies designed to help reach the Europe 2020 target of lifting 20 million people out of poverty, it is important to take stock of the outcomes of the Lisbon agenda for growth, employment and social inclusion. The question arises why, despite growth of average incomes and of employment, poverty rates have not gone down, but have either stagnated or even increased. In this paper we identify the following trends: rising employment has benefited workless households only partially; income protection for the working-age population out of work has become less adequate; social policies and, more generally, social redistribution have become less pro-poor. These observations are indicative of the ambivalence of the Lisbon Strategy and its underlying investment paradigm.

Keywords: employment; Lisbon strategy; poverty; social investment state; social policy; social security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (96)

Downloads: (external link)
https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/oldcontent/cont ... 011/CSB_WP_11_03.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hdl:wpaper:1103

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Santiago Burone ().