Imprecision in the Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Subjective Well-Being Data

Lukas Leitner

No 2310, Working Papers from Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp

Abstract: The subjective well-being (SWB) method has become a popular tool to estimate the willingness to pay for non-market goods. In this method, the willingness to pay measure contains the ratio of two coefficients (of the nonmarket good and consumption), which are both estimated in a regression on subjective well-being. Computing confidence intervals for such ratios turns out to be error-prone, in particular when the consumption coefficient is imprecisely estimated. In this paper, five different ways of computing the confidence intervals are compared: the delta, Fieller, parametric bootstrapping, and bootstrapping method, and a numerical integration of Hinkley’s formula. Using a large number of simulated SWB data sets, confidence intervals and their coverage rates are computed for each method. The findings suggest that the delta method is accurate only if the consumption coefficient is estimated with very high precision. All other methods turn out to be more robust, with minor differences in accuracy.

Date: 2023-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-ecm and nep-hap
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/files/57001/6d5 ... 110-83587c94fafb.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2310

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Santiago Burone ().