Reductionism in Economics: Causality and Intentionality in the Microfoundations of Macroeconomics

Kevin Hoover ()

No 2014-3, Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series from Center for the History of Political Economy

Abstract: In many sciences – physical, but also biology, neuroscience, and other life sciences – one object of reductionism is to purge intentionality from the fundamental basis of both explanations and the explanatory target. The scientifically relevant level – ontologically and epistemologically – is thought to lie deeper than the level of ordinary human interactions. In the material and living world, the more familiar is the less fundamental. In contrast, the economic world of day-to-day life – the world of market interactions – appears to be the relevant level. Macroeconomics is thought to provide an account that is above, not below or behind, ordinary economic decisionmaking. An advantage of a macroeconomic account is that it is possible to employ causal analysis of the economy as a whole analogous to the causal analysis of physical systems. The fear of many economists is that such analyses are untethered to ordinary economic decisionmaking. The object of reductionism in economics – the so-called microfoundations of macroeconomics – is adequately to ground or replace higher level causal analysis with an analysis of the day-to-day interactions of people. The object is not to purge intentionality, but to reclaim it. The paper will attempt to understand the key issues surrounding the microfoundations of macroeconomics from a perspectival realist perspective that elucidates the relationship between economists’ methodological preference for microfoundations and need for macroeconomic analysis – that is, between economists’ respect for the intentional nature of economic life and the need for a causal analysis of the economy. The paper favors metaphysical humility and methodological pragmatism.

Keywords: microfoundations of macroeconomics; reductionism; causation; intentionality; Lucas critique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger, nep-hme and nep-hpe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/949 main text
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/949 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/949)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hec:heccee:2014-3

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series from Center for the History of Political Economy Center for the History of Political Economy Box 90097 Durham, NC 27708-0097.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster ().