Birth Order and Social Outcomes, England, 1680-2024

Gregory Clark and Neil Cummins

No 254, Working Papers from European Historical Economics Society (EHES)

Abstract: Children early in the birth order get more parental care than later children. Does this significantly affect their life chances? An extensive genealogy of 428,280 English people 1680-2024, with substantial sets of complete families, suggests that birth order had little effect on social outcomes either for contemporary outcomes, or in earlier centuries. For a small group of elite families in the nineteenth century and earlier, the oldest son was advantaged in terms of wealth, education, and occupational status. But even in this elite group, among later sons, birth order had no effect. We consider in the paper how the absence of birth order effects in England can be reconciled with reports of substantial negative birth order effects for modern Nordic countries.

Keywords: Human Capital Formation; Birth Order; Intergenerational Mobility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J62 N33 N34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2024-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-hea, nep-his and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ehes.org/wp/EHES_254.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Birth Order and Social Outcomes, England, 1680-2024 (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hes:wpaper:0254

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from European Historical Economics Society (EHES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Sharp ().