Misspecification versus bubbles in hyperinflation data: Comment

Tom Engsted

No 02-2, Finance Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies

Abstract: In this comment I critically review some of the claims and analyses made by Hooker (2000) in his study of the Cagan hyperinflation model. I argue that: i) contrary to what Hooker claims, cointegration tests can be used to discriminate between bubbles and no bubbles; ii) contrary to Hooker's claim, his empirical results for the interwar European hyperinflations do not general imply that the Cagan model is misspecified; iii) although Hooker's analyses build directly on the Durlauf and Hall (1989) methodology, he neglects an important part of that methodology, namely the measurement of the magnitude of noise. I present such measures, and together with reported cointegration tests the noise measure help reinterpreting Hooker's empirical results.

Keywords: Cagan model; Cointegration; Measurement of noise (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
Date: 2002-02-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hha.dk/fin/finance/Research/D02_2.PDF (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Misspecification versus bubbles in hyperinflation data: comment (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhb:aarfin:2002_002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs Allé 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helle Vinbaek Stenholt ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).