Pro-social preferences and self-selection into the public health sector: evidence from economic experiments
Julie Riise and
Ida Lindkvist ()
Additional contact information
Ida Lindkvist: CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute, Postal: CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, Jekteviksbakken 31,, N-5892 Bergen, Norway, http://www.cmi.no/staff/?ida-lindkvist
No 04/10, Working Papers in Economics from University of Bergen, Department of Economics
There is growing interest in the role of pro-social motivation in public service delivery. In general, economists no longer question whether people have social preferences, but ask how and when such preferences will influence their economic and social decisions. Apart from revealing that individuals on average share and cooperate even when such actions lower their own material pay-off, economic experiments have documented substantial individual heterogeneity in the strength and structure of social preferences. In this paper we study the extent to which these differences are related to career choices, by testing whether preferences vary systematically between Tanzanian health worker students who prefer to work in the private health sector and those who prefer to work in the public health sector. Despite its important policy implications, this issue has received hardly any attention to date. By combining data from a questionnaire and two economic experiments, we find that students who prefer to work in the public health sector have stronger pro-social preferences than those who prefer to work in the private sector. We also show that the extent to which these students care about others can be conditional and linked to inequality aversion. A systematic selfselection of pro-socially motivated health workers into the public sector suggests that it is a good idea to have two sectors providing health services: this can ensure efficient matching of individuals and sectors by allowing employers in the two sectors to use different payment mechanisms tailored to attract and promote good performance from different types of health workers.
Keywords: pro-social preferences; career choice; economic experiments; health workers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 H40 I18 J33 J45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-hea, nep-lab and nep-soc
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://ekstern.filer.uib.no/svf/2010/wp%2004.10.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:bergec:2010_004
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Bergen, Department of Economics Institutt for økonomi, Universitetet i Bergen, Postboks 7802, 5020 Bergen, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kjell Erik Lommerud ().