Alternatives for Risk Elicitation in the Field: Evidence from Coffee Farmers in Costa Rica

Maria A. Naranjo (), Francisco Alpizar Rodriguez and Peter Martinsson

No 19-21, EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg

Abstract: Although field experimental methods are the workhorse of researchers interested in risk preferences, practitioners find surveys easier to implement. This paper compares results from experimental versus survey-based methods to elicit farmers’ risk attitudes, in context-free and context-specific decision settings. We then explore how the different survey estimates of risk preferences relate to real-life farming choices in a population of coffee farmers in Costa Rica. Our results indicate that one should be careful when extrapolating risk attitudes across contexts. Contextualized, survey-based estimates of risk preferences do not correlate with general context-free survey estimates, yet context-free survey estimates do predict risk-taking behavior in a context-free risk experiment. Importantly, context-specific survey estimates are associated with risk-taking in the same agricultural real-life context, while context-free survey estimates are not. Practitioners interested primarily in using risk preferences as inputs into policy design should make sure that preferences are elicited in the specific context targeted by the potential policy instrument.

Keywords: risk attitudes; risk elicitation methods; stated preference method; agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2019-10-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.efdinitiative.org/sites/default/files/ ... -21_final_oct_21.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2019_021

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ().