Charging for Plastic Bags as an Effective Nudging Policy
Zafeer Ravat,
Jugal Mahabir and
Johane Dikgang
No 19-22, EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
Abstract:
Policymakers have little experience regarding designing the right levels of pricing for plastic bags. Prices for bags are generally set low and are largely a symbolic reminder to consumers of the environmental concerns attributed to plastic bag use. The ineffectiveness of charging for bags in the long term, in countries such as South Africa, makes it imperative that we map the demand curve. Getting the price “right” depends on the size of the externality. Charging for plastic bags is therefore an effective nudging policy. Moreover, charging the right price levels could alleviate the adverse effects associated with the use of substitute carrier bags. To address this issue, a survey was developed using the Contingent Behaviour (CB) approach to generate the stated preference (SP) data necessary to estimate the price level that is likely to lead to a reduction in bag use over time. Thus, the aim of this study is to estimate the bag-use demand function for reusable plastic shopping bags in South Africa. The current price of $0.03 was found to be too low, and highly inelastic. Our analysis suggests that the price for plastic bags should be set at $0.13. This price will reduce unnecessary plastic use and is still much lower than the price of alternatives; therefore, there is no danger of consumers shifting to alternatives that may cause more harm.
Keywords: contingent behaviour; elasticity; levy; plastic bag; price (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D91 H23 Q53 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2019-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2019_022
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ().