Sulphur Abatement Globally in Maritime Shipping

Elizabeth Lindstad (), Carl Fredrik Rehn () and Gunnar Eskeland
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Lindstad: Sintef Ocean AS (MARINTEK), Postal: MARINTEK,, POB 4125 Valentinlyst, NO-7450 Trondheim, Norway, http://sintef.no/en/all-employees/employee/?empId=1317
Carl Fredrik Rehn: Dept. of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postal: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Marine Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway, https://www.ntnu.edu/employees/carl.rehn

No 2017/8, Discussion Papers from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science

Abstract: In 2016, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) decided on global regulations to reduce sulphur emissions to air from maritime shipping starting 2020. The regulation implies that ships can continue to use residual fuels with a high sulphur content, such as heavy fuel oil (HFO), if they employ scrubbers to desulphurise the exhaust gases. Alternatively, they can use fuels with less than 0.5% sulphur, such as desulphurised HFO, distillates (diesel) or liquefied natural gas (LNG). The options of lighter fuels and desulphurisation entail costs, including higher energy consumption at refineries, and the present study identifies and compares compliance options as a function of ship type and operational patterns. The results indicate distillates as an attractive option for smaller vessels, while scrubbers will be an attractive option for larger vessels. For all vessels, apart from the largest fuel consumers, residual fuels desulphurised to less than 0.5 % sulphur are also a competing abatement option. Moreover, we analyse the interaction between global SOX reductions and CO2 (and fuel consumption), and the results indicate that the higher fuel cost for distillates will motivate shippers to lower speeds, which will offset the increased CO2 emissions at the refineries. Scrubbers, in contrast, will raise speeds and CO2 emissions.

Keywords: Shipping and the environment; Abatement cost and options; CO2; Marine fuels; MARPOL; IMO (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L92 Q50 Q52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2017-06-29
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-tre
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2447332 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2017_008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science NHH, Department of Business and Management Science, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stein Fossen ().