 Willingness to Pay for Private and Public Safety: Why the Difference?Mikael Svensson and Maria Vredin No 2007:2, Working Papers from Örebro University, School of Business Abstract: Previous research on the willingness to pay (WTP) for risk reductions has almost systematically found the mean WTP for public risk reductions to be, both economically and statistically, significantly smaller than the mean WTP for private risk reductions. In this paper, we use socio-economic and social-psychological variables to gain insights into this, according to economic theory, anomalous result. Based on the results from a purpose-made survey, we find that part of the discrepancy can be explained by the individuals' age and his/her attitudes towards privately and publicly provided goods in general. Due to differences in attitudes, the public and private goods are in fact perceived as a two different goods, even if the risk reductions are of equal magnitudes. The results therefore suggest that, in cases where the elicited WTP is intended for public policy purposes, the survey context need to be public is consumer sovereignty should reign. Keywords: Contingent Valuation; Private Safety; Public Safety; Attitudes (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, pages 1205-1212. There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2007_002 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Örebro University, School of Business Örebro University School of Business, SE - 701 82 ÖREBRO, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.