EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?

Ari Kokko, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall () and Josefin Videnord ()
Additional contact information
Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall: The Ratio Institute, Postal: The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden, http://ratio.se/medarbetare/patrik-gustavsson-tingvall/
Josefin Videnord: The Ratio Institute, Postal: The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden, http://ratio.se/medarbetare/josefine-videnord/

No 286, Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute

Abstract: This article examines the distribution of antidumping (AD) disputes across countries and industries, and examines which AD cases reach the dispute settlement system of the WTO. Our general finding is that neither the country nor the industry distribution of AD cases remains constant across the different levels of disputes, as cases proceed from notifications to requests for consultations and third party adjudication at the WTO.

The US is the main user of AD measures, as well as the main target for complaints at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body. However, emerging markets have increasingly started using AD law to protect their domestic firms. We find that the typical AD notification is submitted by an upper middle-income country, and it focuses on a medium low-technology industry with differentiated products, but low relationship-specificity. The most typical complainant at the WTO is also an upper middle-income country, challenging a high-income country (most likely the US) that is allegedly giving unfair protection to an industry producing differentiated goods that are not very relationship-specific, using medium-low technologies.

The analysis also reveals that when lower middle-income countries are challenged at the WTO, disputes are often resolved before third party adjudication is needed.

Keywords: Trade conflict; Antidumping; WTO; Dispute settlement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 F51 F53 H73 O24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52 pages
Date: 2017-03-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2017/03/ak_pt_jv_which ... each_the_wto_286.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2017/03/ak_pt_jv_which_antidumping_cases_reach_the_wto_286.pdf [308 Permanent Redirect]--> https://ratio.se/app/uploads/2017/03/ak_pt_jv_which_antidumping_cases_reach_the_wto_286.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0286

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin Korpi ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-09
Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0286