Regularized Conditional Estimators of Unit Inefficiency in Stochastic Frontier Analysis, with Application to Electricity Distribution Market
Zangin Zeebari (),
Kristofer Månsson (),
Pär Sjölander () and
Magnus Söderberg ()
Additional contact information
Zangin Zeebari: Jönköping University
Kristofer Månsson: Jönköping University
Pär Sjölander: Jönköping University
No 345, Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute
The practical value of Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) is positively related to the level of accuracy at which it estimates unit-specific inefficiencies. Conventional SFA unit inefficiency estimation is based on the mean/mode of the inefficiency, conditioned on the estimated composite error. This approach shrinks the inefficiency towards its mean/mode, which generates a distribution that is different from the distribution of the unconditional inefficiency; thus, the accuracy of the estimated inefficiency is negatively correlated with the distance the inefficiency is located from its mean/mode. We propose a regularized estimator based on Bayesian risk (expected loss) that restricts the unit inefficiency to satisfy the underlying theoretical mean and variation assumptions. We analytically investigate some properties of the maximum a posteriori probability estimator under mild assumptions and derive a regularized conditional mode estimator for three different inefficiency densities commonly used in SFA applications. Extensive simulations show that, under common empirical situations, e.g., regarding sample size and signal-to-noise ratio, the regularized estimator outperforms the conventional (unregularized) approach when the inefficiency is greater than its mean/mode. With real data from electricity distribution sector in Sweden, we demonstrate that the conventional conditional estimators and our regularized conditional estimators give substantially different results for highly inefficient companies.
Keywords: Electricity Distribution; Productivity; Regularized Posterior Likelihood; Stochastic Frontier Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 D24 L94 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-eff and nep-ene
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://ratio.se/app/uploads/2021/03/ratio-working-paper-no.-345.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0345
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin Korpi ().