Accounting for Oil and Gas Exploration Activities: A Triumph of Economics over Politics
No 2015/15, UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance from University of Stavanger
For more than 40 years oil and gas companies have been able to choose between two competing methods for accounting for exploration activities. The literature suggests that accounting method discretion can potentially signal managements' private information with the benefit of improving the relevance of accruals for forecasting future cash flows. However, if accounting method flexibility is used for financial window-dressing, accruals can lose their value-relevance and investors will resort to cash flows measures instead. In this study we compare the value-relevance of earnings versus cash flow for oil and gas companies from 1992 to 2013. Our results suggest that earnings are not significant, independent of accounting method choice, consistent with the view that accruals have limited value in the oil and gas industry. Rather, it seems that cash flow measures of both current and future profitability are significantly associated with oil company returns. These findings suggest that the financial markets lack confidence in oil company earnings, irrespective of accounting method choice.
Keywords: Full cost versus successful efforts; oil and gas company valuation; petroleum accounting; value-relevance. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 M40 Q33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 44 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-ene and nep-for
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8078351/uis_wp ... s_2015_15_misund.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:stavef:2015_015
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance from University of Stavanger University of Stavanger, NO-4036 Stavanger, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bernt Arne Odegaard ().