Tax Competition and the Nature of Capital

Richard Baldwin and Rikard Forslid

No 2002:18, Research Papers in Economics from Stockholm University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The standard race-to-the-bottom result is curious in one respect. If a nation wants to attract foreign capital, providing the optimal level of public amenities (and thus charging the optimal tax rate) would seem optimal. This conjecture fails in the standard tax competition model since foreign capital ignores host nation amenities. While this assumption is reasonable for physical capital, other forms of capital (human capital) tends to move with its owner, so amenities matter. We show that when factors move with their owners, symmetric international tax competition may leads to the socially optimal rate. This result can be thought of as a corollary of the Tiebout efficiency hypothesis.

Keywords: Tax Competition; Tiebout hypothesis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F12 F20 H21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 9 pages
Date: 2002-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pub and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www2.ne.su.se/paper/wp02_18.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Tax Competition and the Nature of Capital (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:sunrpe:2002_0018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers in Economics from Stockholm University, Department of Economics Department of Economics, Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Jensen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).