Good Intentions Gone Bad? The Dodd-Frank Act and Conflict in Africaâ€™s Great Lakes Region
Jeffrey R. Bloem ()
Additional contact information
Jeffrey R. Bloem: PhD Student, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota
No 300, HiCN Working Papers from Households in Conflict Network
The Dodd-Frank Act imposes reporting requirements on US companies regarding supply chain links to conflict minerals. Previous research uses within-DRC variation in the location of mineral mines to identify the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on conflict. Due to the presence of spillovers, these previous estimates may underestimate the effect. Moreover, the legislation regulates reporting on minerals mined in the DRC and all countries surrounding the DRC. To fully evaluate this legislation, I investigate the prevalence of conflict events in the DRC and all surrounding countries. Difference-in-differences estimates suggest that, although there is no evidence of any reduction in conflict within all covered countries pooled together, the unintended consequences of this legislation within the DRC may be larger than previously reported. Supplemental analyses (i) investigate possible mechanisms that drive these results and (ii) find that the enforcement suspension of the legislation is unlikely to reduce conflict in the DRC.
Keywords: Conflict; Minerals; Natural Resources; International Trade Policy; Civil War JEL Classification: D74; F14; O25; Q17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hic:wpaper:300
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HiCN Working Papers from Households in Conflict Network
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alia Aghajanian ().