Painful Birth of Trade Under Classical Monopolistic Competition
Igor Bykadorov (),
Andrea Ellero (),
Stefania Funari (),
Sergey Kokovin and
Pavel Molchanov ()
Additional contact information
Pavel Molchanov: National Research University Higher School of Economics
HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
In the standard Krugman (1979) non-CES trade model, several asymmetric countries typically lose from increasing trade costs. However, all countries transiently benefit from such increase at the moment of closing trade, under almost-prohibitive trade costs (i.e., near autarky, which is possible only under non-CES preferences). In other words, during trade liberalization the first step from autarky to trade is necessarily harmful. Our explanation rests on market distortion and business destruction effects.
Keywords: Trade gains; monopolistic competition; variable elasticity of substitution; free trade; autarky. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D43 F12 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in WP BRP Series: Economics / EC, April 2016, pages 1-35
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:132/ec/2016
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().