EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do Consumers Really Follow a Rule of Thumb? Three Thousand Estimates from 130 Studies Say "Probably Not"

Tomas Havranek () and Anna Sokolova ()

No WP BRP 137/EC/2016, HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: We show that three factors combine to explain the mean excess sensitivity reported in studies estimating consumption Euler equations: the use of macro data, publication bias, and liquidity constraints. When micro data are used, publication bias is corrected for, and the households under examination do not face liquidity constraints, the literature implies no evidence for the excess sensitivity of consumption to income. Hence little remains for pure rule-of-thumb behavior. The results hold when we control for 45 additional variables reflecting the methods employed by researchers and use Bayesian model averaging to account for model uncertainty. The estimates of excess sensitivity are also systematically a ected by the order of approximation of the Euler equation, the treatment of non-separability between consumption and leisure, and the choice of proxy for consumption

Keywords: Excess sensitivity; rule-of-thumb consumers; liquidity constraints; publication bias; Bayesian model averaging (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 D12 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed

Published in WP BRP Series: Economics / EC, May 2016, pages 1-51

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/05/30/1132074373/137EC2016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Consumers Really Follow a Rule of Thumb? Three Thousand Estimates from 130 Studies Say "Probably Not" (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Do Consumers Really Follow a Rule of Thumb? Three Thousand Estimates from 130 Studies Say “Probably Not” (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:137/ec/2016

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev ().

 
Page updated 2019-06-27
Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:137/ec/2016