Actual Problems of Determination Of The Objective Limits of the Prejudgment

Sergey Postylyakov

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: The article deals with relevant problems of determination of the objective limits of the prejudgment using the prejudgment of the particular types of court rulings as an example. The author concludes that the concept of «circumstances» should be defined as facts and established on their basis legal relations. The author considers that the court orders, the judgments in absentia, the judgments of dismissal due to the approval of the settlement as well as the higher court rulings that verify legality of previous judgments not verifying validity should be excluded from the objective limits of the prejudgment. The author analyzes rules of the draft of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 2000 and comes to the conclusion that Article 61 of the current Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation requires to be amended.

Keywords: prejudgment; civil procedure; objective limits; particular types of court rulings; Russian Federation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-law and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Law / LAW, October 2015, pages 1-11

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/10/08/1077561299/55LAW2015.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:55/law/2015

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().