Towards an Institutional Interpretation of TFP Changes in China
Harry X. Wu
No 2019-4, CEI Working Paper Series from Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University
This research note reiterates the productivity theory in the Solow growth accounting framework to explore an institutional interpretation of changes in total factor productivity. In theory, total factor productivity or TFP growth is a costless gain in output, which captures the effect of positive externalities caused by spillovers of technological and organizational changes in a perfect market system. This provides a yardstick to gauge institutional effect on output in an imperfect market system if all inputs are properly measured. Using the Chinese case, I show that an integrated approach a la Jorgenson and Griliches (1967) that ensures a consistency between theory, methodology and measurement can facilitate empirical exercises even with data problems, and a so-constructed TFP index for China can satisfactorily reproduce China's post-reform productivity path with institutional interpretations.
Keywords: Total factor productivity (TFP) growth; Factor reallocation effect on TFP growth; Institution; Economic reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C80 H70 O40 P30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-eff and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hit:hitcei:2019-4
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEI Working Paper Series from Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Reiko Suzuki (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .